Why Waste Time on B+ Stocks When A+ Stocks Exist?
This is the type of screen I care about most.
Strong sales.
Strong earnings.
Strong margins and/or ROE.
Top-tier relative strength.
A leading industry group.
Funds increasing quarter after quarter.
And most importantly, price confirming with higher highs and higher lows.
That is an A+ growth stock profile.
This is not some new idea either.
This is what O’Neil taught. It is what Minervini looks for. It is what David Ryan studied. It is what Dan Zanger used.
The details may vary from trader to trader, but the foundation is very similar.
Remember, institutions drive major sustained moves. Retail does not.
When I see rising sales, rising earnings, good margins and/or ROE, and funds increasing quarter over quarter, I know the stock has the ingredients of a potential major growth leader.
Then price has to confirm it.
Plenty of names have strong fundamentals, but price is saying NO.
Plenty of names have price moving higher, but without the sales, earnings, margins, ROE, or institutional support behind it, the move is less likely to last. Think CAR in April 2026.
And yes, this is an ideal screen.
Most of the time, you will not get every single ingredient. That is okay.
Sometimes I trade stocks with big sales and earnings growth, but margins or ROE are not great yet. Sometimes fund ownership is flat instead of rising. Those stocks can still work.
But I know they are NOT as high quality as a stock that has everything lining up at once.
So if there are big liquid names showing all the characteristics, why waste time forcing trades in lower-quality stocks?
When the fundamentals are strong, funds are building positions, the group is acting well, and price is confirming, that is where I want my focus.




